case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview

case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview

Blog Article

As the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is attained, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) from the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

It's also important to note that granting of seniority to a civil servant without the actual duration of service nearly violates all the service construction as being a civil servant inducted in Quality 17 by claiming this kind of benefit without any experience be directly posted in almost any higher quality, which is neither the intention from the law nor of the equity. Read more

Given that the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been attained, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that may very well be consulted in deciding a current case. It could be used to guide the court, but isn't binding precedent.

Therefore, this petition is found to get not maintainable which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners may perhaps request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

A lot of the volumes (which include more recent volumes than the library's holdings) are offered online through the Caselaw Access Project.

Regulation professors traditionally have played a much more compact role in developing case law in common legislation than professors in civil regulation. Because court decisions in civil legislation traditions are historically brief[four] instead of formally amenable to establishing precedent, much in the exposition of the regulation in civil law traditions is done by lecturers alternatively than by judges; this is called doctrine and will be published in treatises or in journals like Recueil Dalloz in France. Historically, common law courts relied very little on legal scholarship; thus, for the turn with the twentieth century, it had been pretty uncommon to check out a tutorial writer quoted in a very legal decision (except Probably for your educational writings of outstanding judges including Coke and Blackstone).

eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents of the boy or Woman will not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they are able to do if they could Slice off social relations with the son or the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who presents these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to job by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by regulation.

In certain jurisdictions, case law can be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family regulation.

twelve. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons owning their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are to get inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is often a condition precedent for appointment to some Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to your Government service will be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to try and do away with the candidature in the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

The Cornell Legislation School website offers a range of information on legal topics, which include citation of case regulation, and even supplies a video tutorial on case citation.

Any court may well find to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to achieve a different summary. The validity of this kind of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to the higher court.

Since the Supreme audi alteram partem case laws Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been arrived at, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, it is also a very well-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.